FIFA World Cup – The African Confederation (CAF) Should Retain Its Number of Qualifiers
Friday, June 18th, 2010In spite of the poor performance of African teams at the 2010 World Cup, FIFA General Secretary Jerome Valcke confirmed that there are no plans to reduce the allocated spots to the Confederation of African Football (CAF). In the first finals on African soil, there were an unprecedented six African sides in the tournament. South Africa (hosts), Nigeria, Cameroon, Algeria, Ghana and Ivory Coast were the CAF representatives. Only Ghana managed to make it past the group stage. This was the case at the 2006 World Cup in Germany. While the performances of the African teams were poor, the African confederation should retain its five places in the 32-nation finals.
Confederation size
CAF has 54 confederations, which is more than CONCACAF and Asia each have. That only five teams out of this confederation qualify shows how difficult it is to reach the World Cup Finals from this confederation. Size is one consideration that FIFA makes when allocating qualification spots, suggesting that reducing the allocation below 5 would be unfair.
Qualification process
Every confederation has a format for qualifying. If FIFA were to reduce CAF’s allocation, the CAF would have to restructure the format, especially if a playoff place is involved. The CAF should be focusing on how to develop African football, not tweaking the qualification format.
Players
Africa is the homeland to players like Didier Drogba, Samuel Eto’o, Michael Essien, Sulley Muntari and Obafemi Martins. The stars of Africa play at the top clubs in Europe. The World Cup is also about seeing the best players in the world and fewer places for Africa could mean missing some of the world’s best players.
In addition, one must consider that while only Ghana advanced, other African teams performed well in the 2010 tournament. Cameroon lost all their matches, but their games were very entertaining – particularly the game against Denmark. They lost by one-goal margins and were never outplayed. Ivory Coast got four points, but failed because they lost to Brazil and did not put seven goals past North Korea like Portugal did. Nigeria came within two points of advancing and was never outplayed in their group. Algeria – the weakest African team at the 2010 tournament – held England to a draw.
What the 2010 World Cup demonstrated was not that Africa should have fewer teams in the tournament, but that they should not have more than five teams. If the World Cup were not in South Africa, South Africa and Algeria might not even have appeared in the tournament. I hope that we would not see six African teams in the World Cup again, but just the five that they already have. Even European teams floundered in South Africa, while CONCACAF and Asia made good strides. In fact, the performance of the teams from CONCACAF and Asia directly affected the African qualifiers, since Mexico, USA, Japan and South Korea advanced at the expense of African teams.
FIFA is correct in not reducing the number of CAF qualifiers. However, I trust that they would not dream about increasing it anytime soon.